🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.